the constraint advantage: doing more with less in CS

"No new CSM hires for the rest of the year, but you need to handle 20% more customers."

This isn't a hypothetical scenario from some MBA case study. It's the reality facing CS leaders across SaaS right now. Boards want profitable growth. Budgets are frozen. And customer counts just keep climbing.

Most teams panic when they hit this wall. They brace for churn, prepare excuses for declining metrics, and start updating their LinkedIn profiles.

But here's what I've learned from working with dozens of CS organizations navigating this challenge:

Constraints don't just create pressure. They create clarity.

When you can't throw more people at the problem, you're forced to answer the questions you've been avoiding: Which customers’ activities drive renewals? What work could be automated or eliminated? Which segments truly need high-touch support? And what product improvements would reduce the need for intervention entirely?

Let's explore how the most successful CS leaders are leveraging resource constraints into a competitive advantage...

The Three Constraint Levers That Work

When I pose this scenario to CS leaders, their first instinct is often to play defense by cutting service levels across the board.

That's a losing game. The companies that thrive under constraint play offense instead.

Here are the three levers I'd pull immediately:

1. The Time Trap Audit

The Reality: Your CSMs are drowning in work that feels important but doesn't move the needle.

I recently worked with a Series B company whose CSMs were spending 8-10 hours per week on meeting notes, follow-ups, and status updates. When we calculated the cost, they were paying $180,000 annually for glorified administrative work.

The Fix: Run a brutal time audit. Track every CSM activity for two weeks. You'll find "strategic" meetings that could be async updates, repetitive questions screaming for better self-service, and manual processes that AI could handle in seconds.

The winning move isn't just identifying these time sinks — it's building workflows that eliminate them.

2. The 80/20 Customer Reckoning

The Reality: You're likely over-serving your smallest customers and under-serving your most valuable ones.

Most CS teams operate with one-size-fits-all approaches that satisfy no one. Your enterprise customers get the same cadence as your SMB accounts, just with more expensive CSMs.

The Fix: Map revenue against CS effort. You'll often find that 80% of customers generate 20% of revenue but consume 60% of CS resources.

The constraint forces a crucial decision: What's the absolute minimum viable success motion for your lower-tier customers? Strip it down to the essentials, such as product-led onboarding with key human touchpoints, community-driven support, and AI-powered health monitoring with exception-based outreach.

This isn't about abandoning smaller customers; it's serving them in a way that scales.

3. The Content Distribution Problem

The Reality: Your team creates guides, webinars, and best practices that gather digital dust, while CSMs repeatedly answer the same questions.

The Fix: Stop creating more content. Start improving distribution. Focus on the essentials — a clear maturity model, battle-tested implementation playbooks, and outcome measurement frameworks — and obsess over getting these resources into customer workflows, not hidden in a knowledge base they'll never visit.

The Deeper Strategy: Designing for Constraint

The tactical moves above buy you time. But the real opportunity lies in designing your entire CS function for efficiency from the ground up.

Companies that excel under resource constraints approach customer success differently. They don't just optimize existing processes — they question whether those processes are even necessary.

This means shifting from a reactive to a predictive approach by building systems that prevent issues, moving from individual to systematic by creating repeatable frameworks, and transitioning from activity-based to outcome-based by measuring what customers achieve, rather than how many meetings are held.

The Constraint Advantage

Here's the paradox: companies forced to operate under resource constraints often end up with more resilient, profitable CS operations.

Why? Because constraint forces precision. It eliminates the luxury of inefficient processes that persist just because "that's how we've always done it."

The CS teams that master this moment will emerge with systematic advantages like higher CSM productivity, more predictable customer outcomes, better unit economics, and clearer value demonstration to the C-suite.

When the hiring freeze ends, they won't just add more people to the same broken processes. They'll scale proven systems that work.

If you're facing this constraint, start with this question:

What's one CS activity your team could eliminate tomorrow that wouldn't impact customer outcomes?

Be honest. You probably know the answer already.

Then ask a harder one :

What would you build if you had to serve twice as many customers with the same team?

The companies that crack this code won't just survive — they'll define the future of customer success.

🤘

We’re grateful you choose to read each week. When you’re ready for more, there are a couple ways we can help:

» Cover Your SaaS is a financial literacy course for go-to-market leaders. Grab your copy here.

» Promote your product and services to over 5,500+ senior SaaS Customer Success pros by sponsoring our weekly newsletter and podcast.

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up at ChiefCustomerOfficer.io.