High standards, Low expectations

The Middle from GrowthCurve.io

Three ideas to level up your week.

Hey Reader,

Welcome to The Middle, your midweek rundown of the most interesting things we've read this week.

Our Level Up Webinar Series is next week (May 22) on The Big 3 of Subscription Revenue, so I would be remiss not to share the link with you.

As for me, I’ve started my new job and drinking from the proverbial firehose. But it sure doesn’t feel like work when you pick the right job, right? Right.

Alright, enough -- it's time to jump into The Middle.

Jeff

Today’s Newsletter is brought to you by Totango + Catalyst

Discover 3 key steps B2B Sales & CS leaders use for revenue growth: shared goals, data visibility, and team-focused customer experience.

Get insights from JLL, Braze, and Schneider Electric in our CRO guide.

Q1 Software Earnings Are... not good

Listen, I hate to share bad news but... many publicly traded SaaS businesses reported earnings for Q1 and it’s not pretty.

  • 6 out of 40 companies (15%) saw ARR shrink from Q4 ‘23 to Q1 ‘24.

  • Of companies who gave Q2 guidance, 20 out of 37 (54%) guided BELOW Q2 consensus.

  • Of the 33 companies to guide to the full calendar year 2024 only 5 raised full year guidance by more than one percentage point compared to prior full-year guidance (Squarespace, AppFolio, Datadog, Olo and Klaviyo).

  • The median “beat” (Q1 revenue versus Q1 consensus estimates) was 1.5%, which is the lowest it’s been in the last 4 years

Not great.

Especially when 54% of companies have adjusted their guidance below their original plan in Q2. They expect conditions to remain as soft as all those throw pillows we keep on the bed (why do we need so many pillows?!… anyway).

Where’s the problem coming from? Yamini Rangan summed it up in HubSpot’s Earnings Call:

Switching gears to macro. After a strong finish in Q4, we saw a return to weaker demand conditions in the first quarter, similar to what we experienced in 2023.

The buyer urgency that we saw in December did not carry over into Q1. Instead, we saw a return to higher scrutiny of budgets, more decision-makers getting involved and a need for more demos and proof of concepts before signing on purchase decisions.

At the top of the funnel, we saw lead flows shift away from higher quality inbound and partner-sourced leads to lower quality rep source leads.​

This shift plus the lower buyer urgency slowed down deal progression and, in some cases, push deals out of Q1 and into Q2.

Retention has most likely been tough during these conditions but what Rangan describes is pressure at both ends of the new business funnel.

It’s been tough to attract high-quality leads at the top of the funnel from key content and partners, so they have had to rely on outbound motions via sales reps. Then, with already fewer leads in the funnel, each deal is more complicated and takes longer to convert.

All of this screams SLOW.

I’d expect similar outcomes in private software companies too.

How many prospects are 'in market' now

“You’re lucky if even 10% of your potential, total customer base is ‘in market’ at any given time”

Jason Lemkin dropped this on Linkedin and expounded:

😀 Many prospects are happy with their current vendor
🤷‍♂️ Many prospects are "meh" on their current vendor, but would need a huge reason to change
🔏 Many prospects are locked into longer contracts already
⌛ Many prospects don't have time to switch vendors, even if they wanted to
👷‍♂️ Many prospects don't have any resources right now to switch vendors, even if they wanted to

This is something that feels under-talked about.

Most companies capture 'in market' customers… that’s table stakes. The branded campaign, the competitive comparison, or even the form fill on the homepage. It’s “easy.”

Now, influencing your 'out of market' customers to make a change when they don't feel the need to, that's what few companies do well. The 90% that are 'out of market' need a nudge here and a nudge there; it's real marketing persuasion they need.

If 90% of your potential customers aren’t in-market, then:

  • You have to make your solution desirable

  • You have to be present where your customers exist

  • You have to deliver value without an expectation in return

  • You have to build a good product that can deliver an outcome

  • You have to innovate and offer more solutions to stay relevant

There is no shortcut on the list.

AI Corner: Positioning New Products to Customers

Product launches can be great for energizing the sales funnel, but they can drive the retention of customers.

Here’s a prompt to help you identify ways to position your new product to your current customers:

My company is [COMPANY NAME], and we have delivered an experience around our core product [PRODUCT NAME] that helps our customers to achieve [OUTCOME].

We are releasing a new product, [PRODUCT NAME], that will sit alongside of our core product and enhance the customer’s ability to achieve [OUTCOME].

I am working on ways to position this new product for our current customers. Please help me segment our current customers into several key buckets. Based on those customers I want to build a plan around messaging and positioning that helps put us in the best chance to upsell them on this product.

If your team is using AI in your day-to-day work, press reply with a specific tool or prompt that you use so we can highlight you.

High standards, Low expectations

Jensen Huang (CEO of NVIDIA) recently delivered a talk at Stanford about how he built NVIDIA into a $2.28 Trillion business on the philosophy of high standards and low expectations.

Bob Glazer, a renowned entrepreneur and leader, shared his perspective on that talk:

Greatness is achieved through hard work, perseverance and a relentless commitment to excellence, not through entitlement to great expectations. This is true whether you’re designing cutting-edge chip technology or cleaning toilets.

Huang references his struggles during his upbringing as what provided him with resilience and led him to have such low expectations. He doesn’t know how to teach that to others, it's innate from his background.

While you might not be able to teach resilience, I have found that great leaders empower their teams to have high standards and low expectations.

Here's Glazer again:

Today’s leaders would be wise to more readily embrace the paradox of high standards and low expectations, recognizing that giving everything you have doesn’t always mean you should expect everything in return.

How do you set high standards?
By laying out a clear set of priorities and setting milestones with time-bound commitments to each other.

How do you set low expectations?
By creating an open, iterative process where the baseline is the starting point where great things will eventually happen.

Look at some of the great tech companies of recent memory and most of them had a culture of high standards and low expectations (Facebook comes to mind).

It seems to come naturally to the "move fast and break things" cultures of today.

Jeff Breunsbach

Connect on X or LinkedIn

Jay Nathan

Connect on X or LinkedIn

Whenever you're ready, there are 2 ways we can help you:

  1. CoverYourSaaS is a financial literacy course for SaaS leaders. It teaches you the fundamental language of business, SaaS metrics, and how to maximize your impact. This course sets the stage for you to make informed, focused, and profitable decisions. Purchase the course here.

  2. Promote your business to over 3,500+ SaaS leaders by sponsoring our twice-weekly newsletter. We send The Middle each Wednesday and The Level Up every Sunday.

Your Email Preferences:

Your email address is Reader


113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205